A Short Note on Lack of Interoperability in the Internet of Things
Keywords:
Internet of things, Semantic web technologies, Semantic interoperability, Heterogeneous data, Linked dataAbstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) promises a world where devices seamlessly communicate, enhancing convenience, efficiency, and innovation. However, this vision is hampered by a significant challenge: the lack of interoperability. Interoperability refers to the ability of different IoT devices and systems to work together smoothly, regardless of manufacturer or protocol. Currently, diverse standards, protocols, and platforms create silos, preventing seamless integration. This fragmentation leads to inefficiencies, increased costs, and security vulnerabilities. Addressing this issue requires developing and adopting universal standards, fostering stakeholder collaboration, and encouraging an open ecosystem. Solving interoperability challenges is crucial for realizing the full potential of IoT, enabling smarter cities, improved healthcare, and more efficient industries.
References
[1] Marshoodulla, S. Z., & Saha, G. (2023). An approach towards removal of data heterogeneity in SDN-based IoT framework. Internet of things, 22, 100763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2023.100763
[2] Amara, F. Z., Hemam, M., Djezzar, M., & Maimor, M. (2022). Semantic web and internet of things: challenges, applications and perspectives. Journal of ICT standardization, 10(2), 261–291. https://doi.org/10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1029
[3] Mahmoodpour, M., Lobov, A., & Lanz, M. (2018). Configurator module to integrate different protocols for iot solution. 2018 ieee 16th international conference on industrial informatics, Porto, Portugal. IEEE. (pp. 67–73). https://doi.org/10.1109/INDIN.2018.8471983
[4] Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2020). Fault-tolerant mechanism for wireless sensor network. IET wireless sensor systems, 10(1), 23–30. https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2019.0106
[5] Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2019). Fault tolerance in WSN through PE-LEACH protocol. IET wireless sensor systems, 9(6), 358–365. https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2018.5229
[6] Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2019). Detection and avoidance of water loss through municipality taps in India by using smart taps and ICT. IET wireless sensor systems, 9(6), 447–457. https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/iet-wss.2019.0081.
[7] Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2020). Survey on fault tolerance-based clustering evolution in WSN. IET networks, 9(4), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-net.2019.0155
[8] Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2021). Fault tolerance in WSN through uniform load distribution function. International journal of sensors wireless communications and control, 11(4), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.2174/2210327910999200525164954
[9] Mohapatra, H. (2021). Socio-technical challenges in the implementation of smart city. 2021 international conference on innovation and intelligence for informatics, computing, and technologies (3ICT), Zallaq, Bahrain. IEEE. (pp. 57–62). doi: 10.1109/3ICT53449.2021.9581905
[10] Mohapatra, H., & Rath, A. K. (2019). Fault tolerance through energy balanced cluster formation (EBCF) in WSN. Smart innovations in communication and computational sciences: proceedings of ICSICCS-2018 (pp. 313–321). Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-13-2414-729.
Metrics
