AI-driven traffic prediction models for sustainable and resilient urban mobility in IoT-enabled cities

Authors

https://doi.org/10.22105/sci.v2i4.48

Abstract

Rapid urbanization in India has led to severe traffic congestion, negatively affecting economic productivity and the quality of life in cities. This paper examines the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Internet of Things (IoT) to develop advanced traffic prediction models that enhance urban mobility. The paper discusses the significance of AI and IoT in urban mobility, presents case studies from major Indian cities, and addresses the challenges and future trends of these technologies. This paper investigates the integration of AI and IoT to develop advanced traffic prediction models tailored for Indian cities. These models enhance traffic management, reduce congestion, and improve public transportation efficiency by leveraging real-time data collected from various IoT devices. This research provides an overview of traditional traffic prediction models, highlights their limitations, and showcases AI- and IoT-driven solutions, with case studies from cities such as Delhi, Bengaluru, Mumbai, Pune, and Ahmedabad. Challenges such as data privacy, regulatory frameworks, and infrastructure limitations are discussed, along with future trends that promise to further enhance urban mobility.

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Internet of things, Traffic prediction, Urban mobility, Smart cities, Machine learning, Autonomous vehicles

References

  1. [1] Mukherjee, A., & Panda, J. (2024). A study on the urban growth and dynamics over 16 major cities of India. Journal of earth system science, 133(2), 66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-024-02280-9
  2. [2] Executive Summary. (2022). Cities as engines of growth. https://niti.gov.in/sites/default/files/2022-05/Mod_CEOG_Executive_Summary_18052022.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  3. [3] Raj, S. (2025). Rebooting urban mobility. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/rebooting-urban-mobility/articleshow/124334033.cms
  4. [4] Zaman, M., Puryear, N., Abdelwahed, S., & Zohrabi, N. (2024). A review of IoT-based smart city development and management. Smart cities, 7(3), 1462–1501. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7030061
  5. [5] Gurani, P., Sharma, M., Nigan, S., Soni, N., & Kumar, K. (2019). IoT smart city: Introduction and challenges. International journal of recent technology and engineering, 8(3), 3484–3487. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C5245.098319
  6. [6] Gupta, M., Benson, J., Patwa, F., & Sandhu, R. (2020). Secure V2V and V2I communication in intelligent transportation using cloudlets. IEEE transactions on services computing, 15(4), 1912–1925. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2020.3025993
  7. [7] Gondhalekar, G., Tewari, D., Bhardwaj, I., Ponnusamy, S., & others. (2025). Internet of things integration in smart cities enhancing urban living through connected technologies. ITM web of conferences (Vol. 76, p. 3001). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257603001
  8. [8] Peng, L., Liao, X., Li, T., Guo, X., & Wang, X. (2024). An overview based on the overall architecture of traffic forecasting. Data science and engineering, 9(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41019-024-00246-x
  9. [9] Liu, R., & Shin, S. Y. (2025). A review of traffic flow prediction methods in intelligent transportation system construction. Applied sciences, 15(7), 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073866
  10. [10] Afandizadeh, S., Abdolahi, S., & Mirzahossein, H. (2024). Deep learning algorithms for traffic forecasting: A comprehensive review and comparison with classical ones. Journal of advanced transportation, 2024(1), 9981657. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9981657
  11. [11] Roy, K., Chan, L. S., Zhang, X., & Nassir, N. (2025). Multi-task deep learning for joint prediction of traffic emissions and travel delay. Transportation research part d: transport and environment, 146, 104846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2025.104846
  12. [12] Yıldırım, Z. B., & Özuysal, M. (2025). How will autonomous vehicles affect sustainable urban mobility? A decision support framework. Sustainable cities and society, 134, 106936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2025.106936
  13. [13] Kumar, N., Martin, H., & Raubal, M. (2024). Enhancing deep learning-based city-wide traffic prediction pipelines through complexity analysis. Data science for transportation, 6(3), 24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42421-024-00109-x
  14. [14] Xing, Z., Huang, M., & Peng, D. (2023). Overview of machine learning-based traffic flow prediction. Digital transportation and safety, 2(3), 164–175. https://www.maxapress.com/article/id/64cf5d5bfa6c5806d56cd696
  15. [15] Aljahdali, H. M. (2022). A new framework for accelerating magnetic resonance imaging using deep learning along with HPC parallel computing technologies. International journal of advanced computer science and applications, 13(11), 670–678. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2022.0131178
  16. [16] Liu, C., Zhou, X., Zehmakan, A. N., & Zhang, Z. (2023). A fast algorithm for moderating critical nodes via edge removal. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering, 36(4), 1385–1398. https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2023.3309987
  17. [17] Chaudhuri, A. (2024). Smart traffic management of vehicles using faster R-CNN based deep learning method. Scientific reports, 14(1), 10357. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-60596-4
  18. [18] Maiga, B., Dalveren, Y., Kara, A., & Derawi, M. (2023). Convolutional neural network-based vehicle classification in low-quality imaging conditions for internet of things devices. Sustainability, 15(23), 16292. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316292
  19. [19] Chen, Y., & Lu, J. (2025). Research on traffic state prediction method based on traffic flow prediction under multi-time granularity. Scientific reports, 15(1), 24317. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-10267-9
  20. [20] Singh, V., Sahana, S. K., & Bhattacharjee, V. (2025). A novel CNN-GRU-LSTM based deep learning model for accurate traffic prediction. Discover computing, 28(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-025-09526-0
  21. [21] Jabade, V., Isapure, A., Halade, R., Jadhav, J., & Gudgude, S. (2024). Devo connect: bridging social communities on the blockchain. 2024 international conference on intelligent systems for cybersecurity (ISCS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCS61804.2024.10581234
  22. [22] Asha’ari, M. J., Daud, S., & Suki, N. M. (2023). Linking sustainable design and social sustainability performance of chemical manufacturing firms: moderating role of Islamic work ethics. Sustainability, 15(7), 5991. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075991
  23. [23] Michelon, G. K., Assunção, W. K. G., Grünbacher, P., & Egyed, A. (2023). Analysis and propagation of feature revisions in preprocessor-based software product lines. 2023 IEEE international conference on software analysis, evolution and reengineering (SANER) (pp. 284–295). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER56733.2023.00035
  24. [24] JS, S. K., & Vigila S, M. C. (2024). Autoencoder and CNN for content-based retrieval of multimodal medical images. International journal of advanced computer science & applications, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2024.0150429
  25. [25] Park, B., Tang, J., & Kim, S. (2023). Human-object relations and security control in inference system for the user intention. IEEE access, 11, 95368–95380. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3310217
  26. [26] Hu, Q., Lin, T., Wei, T., Huang, N., Zhu, Y. J., & Gong, C. (2024). Covert transmission in water-to-air optical wireless communication systems. IEEE transactions on information forensics and security, 19, 4432–4447. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2024.3376965
  27. [27] Lee, J. G., Lee, S. S., Alam, M., Lee, S. M., Seong, H. S., Park, M. N., ... & Nguyen, D. T. (2024). Utilizing 3D point cloud technology with deep learning for automated measurement and analysis of dairy cows. Sensors, 24(3), 987. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24030987
  28. [28] Yang, X., Guan, X., Pang, Z., Kui, X., & Wu, H. (2024). GridMesa: A NoSQL-based big spatial data management system with an adaptive grid approximation model. Future generation computer systems, 155, 324–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.02.010
  29. [29] Islam, R., Jones, S., & Hudnall, M. (2023). Transportation system functions during hurricane response: A systematic review of modes and methods. Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives, 18, 100786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100786
  30. [30] Kaur, H., Hooda, N., & Singh, H. (2023). k-anonymization of social network data using neural network and SVM: K-NeuroSVM. Journal of information security and applications, 72, 103382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisa.2022.103382
  31. [31] Miao, H. (2016). Message from conference chair. 2016 17th IEEE/ACIS international conference on software engineering, artificial intelligence, networking and parallel/distributed computing (SNPD) (pp. 1-1). IEEE Computer Society. https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/SNPD.2016.7515866

Downloads

Published

2025-12-17

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Smart City Insights

Section

Articles

Categories

How to Cite

Saheli, H., & Nozick, V. (2025). AI-driven traffic prediction models for sustainable and resilient urban mobility in IoT-enabled cities. Smart City Insights, 2(4), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.22105/sci.v2i4.48

Similar Articles

21-30 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.